Model results · OpenAI

GPT-6.1 Terra

Suitev4
GPT-6.1 Terra across every effort level
In Codex across five effort levels: combined score 74.95 at Low, 80.10 at Medium, 79.19 at High, 83.68 at Extra-high and 90.00 at Max. Tasks passed 13, 12, 15, 16 and 23 of 23, with every hidden test passed at Max; Code quality 66.55 to 76.59; 2.8 to 6.9 minutes per task. Every cell is judged on 23 runs.
October 30, 2026 · 23 tasks · 5 effort levels · 115 runs of GPT-6.1 Terra · VulcanBench Frontier v4 · Code quality protocol v3.29
→
Suitev4
Beside Claude Opus 5.5, GPT-6.1 Sol and GPT-6 Astra
At Max GPT-6.1 Terra scores 90.00, between Claude Opus 5.5 (90.22) and GPT-6 Astra (89.30), and is the cheapest and fastest of the four at every level: $0.36 and 6.9 minutes a task at Max. On the Frontier v4 board its Max level ranks 16th of 80 columns.
October 30, 2026 · comparison card · VulcanBench Frontier v4
→
Suitev4
Cost and tokens across effort levels
$0.11 to $0.36 per task at list API rates and 0.77M to 2.38M raw tokens per task across the five effort levels; the whole sweep prices at $22.49 for 115 runs, $0.20 per task.
October 30, 2026 · API-equivalent estimates at list rates, solver inference only · VulcanBench Frontier v4
→
Tracesv4
Redacted agent traces: GPT-6.1 Terra on Frontier v4
The trace repository for the sweep in the report above, published separately on GitHub. Structure only: every agent message, shell command and file change with its timing, and a closing summary per run, without the task content.
GitHub · vulcanbench-gpt61-terra-traces
→

How would GPT-6.1 Terra do on your stack?

Public results answer "which model is stronger on this suite." Whether GPT-6.1 Terra belongs in your routing table depends on your languages, your codebases, and your task mix, that gets measured, not guessed. Grading rules are in the methodology.