Model results · Anthropic

Claude Haiku 5.5

Suitev4
Claude Haiku 5.5 across every effort level
In Claude Code across five effort levels: combined score 84.42 at Low, 84.03 at Medium, 88.01 at High, 91.83 at Extra-high and 92.16 at Max (judged n=23, 22, 23, 22, 21). Tasks passed 13, 13, 17, 22 and 22 of 23; $0.84 to $1.54 a task as Claude Code reports it.
October 12, 2026 · 23 tasks · 5 effort levels · 115 runs of Claude Haiku 5.5 · VulcanBench Frontier v4 · Code quality protocol v3.24
→
Suitev4
Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5, GPT-6.1 Sol and GPT-6 Luna
The four models side by side at every effort level on the same 23 tasks and judges, with three comparison cards. At Max Haiku 5.5 and Sonnet 5.5 are effectively tied (92.16 ± 0.37 against 92.02 ± 0.35), Haiku about 3.6 times cheaper per task.
October 12, 2026 · 23 tasks · 5 effort levels · 460 runs · VulcanBench Frontier v4
→
Suitev4
Cost, tokens and Haiku’s price tiers
Haiku 5.5 costs five times as much for prompts over 100,000 tokens, so each level shows Claude Code’s own total beside a floor and a ceiling. $1.04, $1.36, $1.25, $0.84 and $1.54 per task from Low to Max; the whole sweep priced at $138.31 (floor $31.10, ceiling $155.50).
October 12, 2026 · API-equivalent estimates, solver inference only · VulcanBench Frontier v4
→

How would Claude Haiku 5.5 do on your stack?

Public results answer "which model is stronger on this suite." Whether Claude Haiku 5.5 belongs in your routing table depends on your languages, your codebases, and your task mix, that gets measured, not guessed. Grading rules are in the methodology.